The Anima

Detail, Michelangelo's "Creation of Adam," God's outstretched hand nearly touching Adam's

In this essay, I will explore the concept of the anima as understood within the framework of Jungian psychoanalytic theory1. Specifically, “anima” refers to the feminine psychological tendencies described in traditional models, which serve as foundational elements in understanding the complexities of the human psyche. However, it’s important to recognize that this definition is just the starting point; the landscape of psychological theory is ever-evolving, growing alongside humanity itself. As we delve into these ideas, we will uncover how the anima not only reflects historical perspectives but also continues to shape contemporary understandings of the self.

I previously discussed archetypes and their functions, briefly touching upon the concepts of the anima and animus. In this article, I’ll delve deeper into the anima, which represents the archetypal, unconscious feminine aspect. As an archetype, the anima resides within the collective unconscious and exerts a profound influence on culture. While this psychic structure transcends gender, I’ll first explore the influence of the anima specifically among men.

Psychologically, the anima serves as a man’s soul, so to speak. Jung referred to the anima as “the archetype of life itself,” emphasizing the importance of maintaining an ongoing dialogue and partnership with one’s personal anima. When a man is full of life, he is said to be “animated.” Conversely, a man disconnected from his soul often feels dull and listless, projecting those same qualities outwardly. This state—whether termed depression or boredom—is a malaise that has been recognized since ancient times. For thousands of years, among so-called primitive peoples, this condition has been described as a loss of soul.

Psychologically, the anima functions
in a man as his soul.

The inner feminine often emerges in a man’s dreams simultaneously with the appearance of his shadow self. In these dreams, the anima typically takes the form of a female figure, while the shadow side is represented as male. A man’s internal image of woman is initially shaped by his experiences with his personal mother or closest female caregiver. This image is later influenced by interactions with other women—friends, relatives, and teachers. However, the impact of the personal mother is so profound and enduring that a man often finds himself drawn to women who resemble her, or conversely, to those who are her direct opposite. In essence, he may yearn for the comfort of the familiar or seek to escape it at all costs.

The anima embodies all the feminine psychological tendencies within a person, including prophetic hunches, intuitions, moods, receptivity, the capacity for personal love, an appreciation for nature, and the connection to the unconscious.2 Just as females in ancient times served as diviners to discern the divine will and forge a connection between humanity and the gods, the anima plays a similar role, linking a one to the great unknown.

Jung distinguished four broad stages of the anima in the course of a man’s psychological development. He personified these as Eve, Helen, Mary, and Sophia according to classical stages of eroticism.

In the first stage, Eve, the man’s Anima is completely tied up with the mother–not necessarily his personal mother, but the image of the woman as a faithful provider of nourishment, security, and love. The first Eve represents all that is natural, instinctual, and biological. The man with an anima of this type cannot function well without a vital connection to a woman and easily falls prey to being controlled by her. He may suffer impotence or have no sexual desire at all. Other ways in which this type of anima possession manifests are through fear of accidents or disease, or in a sort of dullness of personality. The Greek Sirens or the German Lorelei personify this dangerous aspect of the anima, which may even lead a man to his death. This illustrates what is true of other psychological content, namely that it has two aspects, benevolent and malefic.

In the second stage, personified in the historical figure of Helen of Troy, the Anima is sexual being with collective appeal. She is Marilyn Monroe, Madonna, and Angelina Jolie. The man under her spell is often a Don Juan who engages in repeated sexual adventures. These will invariably be short-lived for two reasons: he has a fickle heart, and no real woman can live up to the expectations that go with this unconscious, ideal image.

The third stage of the Anima is Mary, who raises love to the heights of spiritual devotion. It manifests in religious feelings and a capacity for genuine friendship with women. The man with an anima of this kind is able to see a woman as she is, independent of his own needs. His sexuality is integrated into his life, not an autonomous function that drives him. He can differentiate between love and lust. He is capable of lasting relationships because he can tell the difference between the object of his desire and his inner image of woman.

Theoretically, a man’s anima development proceeds through these stages as he grows older. When the possibilities of one have been exhausted, the psyche stimulates the move to the next stage. This move seldom happens without a struggle or a crisis of some sort that helps to move a man forward in his anima development, but the move forward is always worthwhile, for it leads him ever onward, to his true inner home.

As with any psychological content, anima relations have their pitfalls. For example, a man may be captured by his anima, so to speak, and so identify with her that he finds her in an actual woman, marries or partners with her, and is led away from his responsibility to himself. In fairy tales, this problem is often represented by the false bride character.

When inner realities are not recognized or owned, they appear in the outside world through projection. Thus, if a man’s anima is lonely and desperate for attention, he will tend to fall in love with dependent women who demand his time and energy. The man with a mother-bound anima will choose a woman who wants to take care of him. The man not living up to his potential will be attracted to women who goad him on and make more of him than he would otherwise be. In other words, whatever qualities a man does not recognize or develop within himself will confront him in real life.

Negative manifestations of the ignored or repressed anima can be seen in a man’s waspish and poisonous remarks, whereby he gives the image of a person playing a destructive intellectual game. He may become such a pseudo-intellectual that he loses all joy and spontaneity in life and becomes stalled by always ruminating on it.


  1. Developed by Carl G. Jung, analytical psychology is an approach to understanding the human psyche. It emphasizes integration of conscious and unconscious elements. ↩︎
  2. Feminine psychological tendencies as described in traditional frameworks include traits like nurturance, caregiving, sensitivity, empathy, and expressiveness. Another framework for the feminine psyche was introduced by Jungian analyst Toni Wolff. ↩︎
  3.  Jung, Carl (Ed.). Man and His Symbols. New York, Dell, 1964, p. 195. ↩︎
  4. Ibid., 198. ↩︎




45 responses to “The Anima”

  1. mkyogi Avatar

    Your anima article here on The Third Eve inspires ideas: awakening the inner feminine; the spine/solar plexus; being born again. There are so many truths, so many labels. We have god/goddess creation through human experience. Lilith converts Eve in Eden: apple, serpent food, reproduction. We breathe to be alive, and we are what we eat. One sees Mary (Gen. 3:15), the remover of curses through Christ–the 2nd Eve. Finally, for the practitioner awakening the Third Eve (bride of christ, church, humanity), consider the Roman myth of Mithra, the sun goddess, converted to North Star, and the light of the holy spirit awakening her desire to grow.

    Though so much is still beyond human reach in today’s world, your writing fills one with hope. Congratulations on beautiful blog and essay.

  2.  Avatar
    Anonymous

    Thank you

  3. Being Avatar
    Being

    Some similar experiences, to others, I have also noted; so I’m just sharing mine…
    with others’ insights. The time of the summer solstice or June 21, regardless of the northern or southern hemisphere for me, has been the time of beginning meditation; that continues quite peacefully, regardless of surrounding external situations, for the next twelve to thirteen lunar cycles.
    Joining the time from June to August, joins the anima and animus, male and female aspects, or Sun and Moon.

    Trying to begin at other times, is not as reliable. This start can continue meditation cycles, in harmony with moon cycles, until about the time of the actual birthday, after June 21; and then, one can go much deeper, sometimes with some difficult external situational experiences, after the lengthy time of meditation. Remembering the peace from the continuous 13 month plus time of meditation, is motivation to return to the process.

    And then the whole cycle can start again…from about or just before June 21, even if there are some delays to returning to it.

  4. Janet Brizell Avatar
    Janet Brizell

    The animus in woman is her inspiration to completely lay her life down for her god. As her journey develops through the years he becomes real to her (her convictions of love for him). The sting is that only at her death will they unite. But that is wonderful for the feminine spirit because her true self and life is in her death. She lives her life in faith. Her faith is there by her side through thick and thin. Her wholeness is realized right here on earth because her faith becomes her stronghold and heaven.

  5. Oscar Martinez Avatar

    It follows from the above analysis that real-life females also tend to fall into these four categories. Jung himself reported that he had a Jewish female patient who seemed the incarnation of Sophia; so much that, in a dream, he was kneeling before her. Ever since I was a teen, I found the Eve kind of females if not unattractive, low and animal-like. As to whether there is a development into these stages of the anima, a lot depends on one’s inner work, doesn’t it? It is hard work; hence a few of Jung’s patients ended up as Freud’s patients complaining about inner work, as in Jungian therapy, being inhumane. But, yes, some of us are destined to that kind of inner work.

  6. erictb Avatar

    Great information:

    A Jungian writer I was communicating with mentioned these stages (generically, as “biological mother”, “romantic and erotic lover”, “spiritualized muse”, and “a source of inner wisdom”.
    A man stuck in the mother phase is a “puer” (exemplified by Peter Pan and other similar characters), who will often suffer the “madonna/whore syndrome”, marrying an innocent woman but being drawn to less innocent mistresses on the side, or just not being able to settle down.

    It’s clear what a projection of the first two phases is like, but I was wondering what projection of the “spiritualized muse” (“Mary”, it seems; though you would think Mary would represent the “Mother”) is like. You say he “is able to see a woman as she is, independent of his own needs” and “he can tell the difference between the object of his desire and his inner image of woman”. Does that mean seeing a woman as inspiring, and liking her a lot (as a woman), but being able to separate this from being driven to pursue her sexually or romantically?

    I take it the fourth phase is not projected onto women at all, because this is when we’ve integrated it, right? (Though I was told we cannot completely own the anima, and the most we could do would be like bringing home a bucket of water from the ocean rather than owning the ocean. The ocean I imagine, representing the depths of the entire unconscious).
    Have no idea what this phase is like. Must be nice to have it all inside and not project onto women.

    1. Magnus Avatar
      Magnus

      I understand them all to be mythical aspects of women. Even Sophia. But they go from the instinctual to the spiritual, so in that sense there is a development. And a man with a developed anima can see a woman through all these mythical lenses, even the lower stages: a caregiver, a lover, a friend, a source of wisdom. So I think Sophia is still a projection, but a more spiritual one, and at that stage the man has also the capability to see the lower stages. But I’m no expert on this, but that’s how I’m thinking now.

      1. MT Avatar
        MT

        Eve is the Mother of all, I guess. So then maybe Mary is not the Mother (Mary) here but Mary Magdalene? A spiritualised version of her, risen from sexual or promiscuous second state of stage, and becoming a spiritual accomplish, a pilgrim.

        1. MT Avatar
          MT

          Wow, my writing’s not usually so bad. Not that it was bad, but… accomplish? Accomplice! And I think I meant for that to be ‘second state or stage’. But anyway. A spiritual accomplice!

          1. Eve Avatar

            I blame spellcheck for everything, MT, and this case is no exception! 😜

          2. MT Avatar
            MT

            My accomplice wasn’t with me on that occasion to correct me ;P

  7. Linda Bebbington Avatar

    Hello everyone, I’m writing a piece about the designer Alexander McQueen and how one of his collections was influenced by his anima. I’m aware that Jung had the four stages, namely Eve, Helen etc. The earlier stages seem to be described above in terms of man’s DonJuan complex etc, lusting after women. How does it manifest in the world of a gay man not interested in pursuing woman as sexual objects of desire. Clearly McQueen was gay, thus the question. Any help would be superbly appreciated. Namaste.

    1. Eve Avatar

      Hi, Linda. Thanks for such a great question! I’m intrigued. My initial response is that the anima and animus are simply words for the masculine and feminine principles. Thus, a gay man would have an inner masculine principle, and an inner feminine principle. These aren’t strictly gender-based. For instance, the masculine principle goes and gets something; it’s the focused part. I call the masculine the pointy part, the compass needle. Its characteristics arise from our biology, to be sure, but also go beyond biology since at our highest level of functioning we are one and experience oneness (no male or female, as I think Christ said).

      The gay man who isn’t interested in pursuing a woman as a sexual object of desire nevertheless experiences (theoretically) all of the stages of his own inner development of anima and animus. He may relate to them differently than he would were he straight, but he’d still experience movement from a less mature state to a more mature one as he moved through life with intentions of growth.

      In the case of McQueen, what does the collection show about the anima influence? I mean what do you see (not what you think you should see, or what you think Jung might say–Jung said, “I thank God I am not a Jungian!” haha!)… but what do you see? When you look at earlier collections and later ones, what in particular stands out about the collection to which you refer?

      I did some in-depth work on Van Gogh one year for a master’s degree, and was amazed and thrilled to see changes in his mental or spiritual state objectified, as it were, through his work at various times. If you try to understand the work as symbolic (and not mere signs pointing the way), then you may be able to see what McQueen was showing of his inner life. Whether his anima relation was as a friend or lover, sister or mother, doesn’t really matter. Do we even know that it *was* something that came out of his relationship to the anima? What if it was his animus? And, remember, these are just handy terms. It’s always a temptation to look at the pointing finger instead of the moon it points to. Look for the moon, see what you see, and stick with it. Hope this makes sense!

    2. Oscar Martinez Avatar

      This is a tangential answer on my part; but the topic of homosexuality has been politically manipulated to the point that there is little serious discussion about this issue; so anything that may shed light on it matters. The Jungian therapist I mention in other comments told me two things about male homosexuality: 1- It is the contamination of the anima by the shadow. 2- According to Jolande Jacobi, homosexuality is a “biological misunderstanding.” Incidentally, when I publicly made the latter comment, while I was working as a counselor, the rage among my colleagues was so rampant that luckily nobody had an AK-47 to shoot me! Clearly, Alexander McQueen must have been working out his inner conflicts, not like gay activists love to say “happy about his queer life.”

  8. Rohit Ramachandran Avatar

    Very nice read. Bookmarked.

  9. Demar Mau Avatar
    Demar Mau

    Once at 23, I escaped from the Anima and Shadow. It was through 3 months of self energized mindfulness training. No sex and no masturbation. Acting totally and purposefully out of character on whatever occasion it was possible; constantly questioning choice and outcome, to the massive confusion of others (but so what, projections are there to be explored and broken, everyone is free to do this, so no guilt attached). At the end of three months a portentous dream. Flying down stairs with a 23 year old female dressed in a virginal white dress with a ‘hoodbog’ a James Dean Shadow character chasing me. The Anima calling to him “capture him’. And ‘i’ running away from them, while they were fast gaining. They caught up again with me again. Projections returned. Now starts the second attempt. This time as a Buddhist monk in 10 years time. The anima and shadow can be transcended. All the archetypes of the CC can be left behind. In this way you are no longer human, but a arhat (a noble being, beyond definitions of good and evil, a noble one. Inert. Consciousness free from the bind of energy and matter, the content of the archetypes, archetypes lose their ‘inflation’ and eventually disappear. Never really had a need for them anyway. Not when Nibbana beckons. “You may call me a dreamer, but i’m not the only one.” One day you’ll join us, and the world will be one (in consciousness – projection free – Jung was good, but his ego got in the way, as does ‘mine’, ‘me’, ‘i’. Whatever they ‘really’ are. Illusions as illusive as the archetypes that underly them). There always equations to balance. As i am seeing with my daughters choice of partner, my sons behavior, my niece and nephew, even my ‘exteriorized’ anima wife. Interesting to see the connections that the CC creates to balance equations. No longer it matters to ‘me’. For the freedom ‘i’ seek is no stranger to ‘me’. Purpose and toil take their toll, but no longer a sage to them am ‘i’. No sage at all with care minimized, no longer caring if its day or night. Seeing all as one, no longer death being the final one.

    For his genius Jung was still a product of his time. With a ego to boot. Buddha the teacher, is greater than he, the path blazed, is the path for me. The 3 states of reality, consciousness, energy and matter, through this realization, all intertwine. Give shape to the form and the structure that confines. Boundaries no more, freedom beckons, of to Nibbana the trail to blaze.

    1. Eve Avatar

      Wonderful comments! Yes, indeed; I think probably Jung would agree with you that he had far to go as a person (or non-person, as the case may be). He was contributing what he had, which was monumental; I think this was his task rather than actually doing what he saw *could* be done. I so enjoyed this comment. YOu are on a good path, Demar Mau. Thank you for sharing.

      I’m reminded of this: “If you see a Buddha on the path, kill him.”

    2. Oscar Martinez Avatar

      Perhaps you live in the Orient; but to us in the West the Buddha can be a rather alien concept, as respectable as it is. Jung represents our culture; we can relate to his concepts as our own reality. Either way, I was also reading a most interesting Marxist thinker, Herbert Marcuse, who translated Marx’s concept of alienation into sociology, nonetheless as the concept of the one-dimensional man, which Jung called the one-sided aspect of the Western culture. What Marcuse calls alienation Jung called it the up-rootedness of the masses; but it is the same concept. The alienation we see both in the Orient and the Occident is catastrophic. I worry a lot about China, a nation that has prompted peasants to massively move to large cities; in no time China will suffer the same problems that our post-industrial societies have long experienced, such as, precisely, alienation. Back to your position, if Buddhism works out for you against alienation, it’s your way, or Way, as in Taoism, my only “religion.”

  10. Eve Avatar

    Stranger, anima and animus don’t merge; they remain archetypes in their own right, each individually. This is the theory. However, another archetype, that of the Divine Couple or Royal Couple, may be what you’re intuiting when you ask this question. We know somewhere deep within us that we’re meant to contain it all, to “enlarge our hearts,” and to grow into wholeness.

    Jung suggested several representations of wholeness such as the mandala, the Divine Couple, even the hermaphrodite.

  11. Yury Avatar
    Yury

    Hi, could you answer this question.
    If I’m stuck in the first stage of development, Eve, how do I move out of it? Consciously I realise that I’m just projecting the ability to provide love, nurturing and security onto women, which is unhealthy, but how do I move past that? My conscious realisation of this fact hasn’t removed the desire to receive love, nurturing and security. All I’ve been able to do is grieve over the fact that nobody can provide me with these.

    Regards

    1. Eve Avatar

      Yury, hello and welcome. If you already realize you’re projecting, then you are well on your way. If you’ll read through some of what I’ve written about projection (such as the information about how we recall our projections and begin the inner work), that can point you in the right direction. Jung taught that no one is ever entirely free of projections or entirely conscious, although we have archetypes and historical role models (Buddha, Jesus, etc.). It’s a lifelong work, but a very exciting and meaningful one, no?

      I think I understand what you mean about grieving over the fact that no one else can ever entirely contain you or gratify you. What we did not get from our parents we can never fully regain. Many argue that we could never have fully gotten it from our parents, either, because we are spiritual beings who need Spirit to fill the voids. If not spiritual, then we go inward, becoming spelunkers into the caves of our own unconscious. You can learn to love yourself, nurture yourself, and find security in a vast and unpredictable universe. I do believe there is love, and I believe that if you give your self the time he needs, you will find your anima (your female half) in there longing to help. Let me know how you are doing!

      1. Stranger Avatar
        Stranger

        I was wondering if it was possible for the anima and animus to bacome one being? I mean the anima and animus becoming genderless.

        1. Sonny Avatar
          Sonny

          I don’t think they can become one; not in this incarnation. But I do believe that they can reach such a tremendous harmony (say with Buddha and Jesus) that their different aspects blur into one. I think that is what is exciting about working through each of the stages of Anima/Animus development.

    2. Oscar Martinez Avatar

      Perhaps this will help. With a bright Jungian analyst, someone who was a trained surgeon before undertaking psychotherapy, we analyzed the kind of narcissism back then I had; which was related to that which he called my “abandonica” (Spanish for “abandoning”) mother. He told me that, to Jung, the myth of narcissus did not have the completely negative connotations that Freud assigned to it. Narcissus looks at his image in the water, he told me, because love to self is the only love he had experienced. So a little narcissism is not bad; just that one has to overcome it. Actually, I have a degree in Psychology, from a Ohio university. We studied something called “attachment”: if your attachment to your mother was not good, you will have attachment problems, with females, until something comes up and you overcome the problem. In my case, here in Ohio, my rapport with a family therapy counselor meant a lot to me, that is years after my Jungian psychotherapy. I did not realize back then; just years after the facts. It was, in short, a healing experience having to do with chemistry: I admired her, a Gestalt practitioner and a Buddhist, hence the advanced type of a female. Perhaps you never had a healing experience in the sense of attachment. I would also recommend you to have a good astrological birth chart analysis; there are good sources over the internet. Plus dream interpretation and analysis, that now is accessible over the internet if you are careful of the sources, also helps because it represents something unique to you.

  12. Frank_Rizzo Avatar
    Frank_Rizzo

    A,

    So, I have to ask, does being gay change yourself identifying as a man? Does being gay somehow change the very nature of your being? If so, I would wonder if transgendered is the correct term. Therefore I would have to agree with Eve in saying that Jungian archetypes apply to men, regardless of being gay or straight. At least these are my current views on this subject. I find that if this is not the case, something must be deeply different within a gay person. There would have to be something that makes them so drastically different that developmentally they are not the same as I am. I have to admit that I do not think gay men to be that dissimilar to me developmentally. You or someone else may have something else to say, however.

    Eve, the more you talk about homosexuality, the more impressed I am. You are not saying much on the subject, but what you have said interests me greatly. This is also something I have been struggling with lately. With many of the statements you have made I wonder if we are finding the same things. Perhaps I will send you a private message one day with my thoughts on the issue and we can compare and see how similar they are. Unfortunately they are quite jumbled and I am a bit too lazy to organize them right now.

  13. A Avatar
    A

    Thanks for the response (and research), Eve! I really appreciate your thoughts on the matter. At the moment, I don’t have the time to spend on reading much outside of assigned reading. Interesting as it is, I sometimes wish I could read some heavier stuff on the side, but it’s just not possible (I tried last year and ended up with a “B” in a class. Unacceptable.)

    The reason I ask is that I don’t identify at ALL with the “bitchy gay man” that you mention. And it would seem that my personality/psyche would fit more with this progression, but minus the female attraction. I have grown to believe that I have always had same-sex attractions, and there wasn’t a point in time when my “original” orientation was damaged, altered, etc. to result in a homosexual orientation. If this is the case, then there are some stages that I didn’t pass through at age-appropriate times. Internally, probably, but you can only get so far without a third part in terms of psychological (or sexual) development, and I just didn’t have this “third party.” So many social norms stood in the way, so any that I did have were guilt-ridden and negatively-associated. I’m learning how to change that, and it’s a process. I understand what you’re saying about “identifying with an archetype” and how that can be damaging in the long-term. Archetypes only serve a purpose insofar as they put a description to a general phenomenon. Am I right in this? I studied archetypes and wrote a term paper on them for a wonderful English professor in high school, but my understanding may have been just that – sophomoric.

    I’ll certainly look into that book. I may be able to get it through the university library. There’s an inter-school loan program that allows me access to many California university libraries.

    1. Eve Avatar

      A.: To answer your question about archetypes, yes and no. Yes, if we are talking about archetypes of the collective unconscious. They are generalized because they’re common to all of us. For instance, we “get” Harry Potter because he’s that orphan archetype; we “get” Dumbledore or Gandalf as the Wise Old Man, McGonogal as the Wise Old Woman, etc.

      In terms of personal archetypes, there are not as many generalizations to be made. We can say that a man with too much anima can be bitchy at his worst, or that a woman with too much animus can be rigidly opinionated and controlling. This would be true whether a person was straight or gay.

      A developed person should be able to integrate his or her personal archetypes, such as shadow, anima/animus, wise old man, hero, divine couple, etc., along with the persona and the ego. They work together rather like aspects of temperament.

      I read recently the fascinating idea that at a very early biological stage of gender identification, there’s a sort of cellular struggle between male and female to see which ‘side’ will win out. The winner determines the fetus’s gender identity, but the loser’s genetic stuff remains buried in the biology of the fetus.

      Supposing this is true, then at some point the lost material is going to want an influence, too. We see that often older men become more feminine after retirement, and older women become more masculine. Their social roles have given way to more balanced identities.

      I don’t have many answers in this area because I haven’t had the reasons to think about it as you have. I do think that more students of these issues are needed who will grow up to be theorists. Perhaps you’re one.

      Put another way, supposing a woman like my grandmother is widowed. She never marries again, saying that one marriage and one love was enough to last her a lifetime. Does this mean my grandmother wasn’t attracted to men any more? No. It meant that my grandmother transcended the need for marriage and entered into advanced widowhood. She didn’t need another man for companionship or love, as her relationship to God, family and herself was enough. Nobody would suggest that she was unbalanced for these reasons.

      I don’t think that God made us to carry sexual issues with us eternally, and I think that we have to look beyond them if we can, to see what’s actually going to last. Sex is great and all, but if given the choice between carnal knowledge or merging with the God of the universe, I’ll take the God merge, thanks!

  14. Lamberakis Avatar
    Lamberakis

    Next, write about the animus, please. I’m hooked, OK? I’m sure that’s clear. I’m your groupie.

    1. Eve Avatar

      Eh, you got me! I’m writing about the animus tomorrow. I’ll even post photos of Tarzan!

  15. deb Avatar

    This was a very interesting post. Do men always pass through these stages? Can they get stuck?

    “In other words, whatever qualities a man does not recognize or develop within himself will confront him in real life.”

    So a man who does not develop compassion, what happens to him? How is he confronted with this undeveloping quality? Or is it different for everyman?

    1. Eve Avatar

      Deb, yes, men can get stuck in their anima development, and often do. Most men, Jung said, never reach the fourth stage (nor do most women ever reach the last stage of animus development).

      One could speculate about whether compassion is exclusively the realm of the feminine or not; but, to answer your question, what a man who refuses his anima might be faced with would vary (as you suggested) by the individual. Though it paints my answer broadly, I’d guess that a man in that situation might choose a partner or spouse who embodies his outcast compassion; or his unconscious parts might be sentimental and emotional (dreams, fantasies, etc.). Or he may go the other direction entirely and become mean.

      The basic rule of thumb is that whatever is denied internally, manifests externally. His handicap would be obvious in some way to everyone but himself, probably.

  16. Mary Joan Koch Avatar

    Eve, I am reading these wonderful posts. I just haven’t had time to write a thoughtful comment yet.

  17. Red Avatar

    I’m curious about what you think of the symbolic interaction of two archetypes, for instance an archetype paired together as a couple, specifically homosexual couples.

    I’ve noticed in todays society that two women together sexually is highly appealing to men as well as homosexual women. For homosexual men to women and society it seems the opposite because of their feminine attraction to another male is viewed as weak.

    Of course there is a following of women being attracted to the thought of homosexual men but its not as prominate in society or a women would never admit it because they think it would bring shame on them.

    So what do you think? two women archetypes being mates somehow provide a symbolic double-whammy for a man or two swords paired together is double the masculine archetypal power? I think I formulated my curiousity to this matter well enough to my knowledge and understanding of this article, so excuse me if it seems silly, I am primarily a hobbyist when it comes to psychology.

  18. ERIC Avatar
    ERIC

    On the topic of Anima, readers may want to read my Jungian-derived movie review published in ERBZINE last year: “See Tarzan and Jane Finally Meet Their Match (1934) and Tarzan and the Valley of Gold (1966).” In this article, I identified Jane as an iconic cinematic representation of a first-stage anima Eve.

    1. Eve Avatar

      Eric, hello, and thanks for the suggestion. I think Jane as a first-stage anima Eve type is interesting and I’ll be reading your article this week.

      For regulars who are also interested, the URL is here:
      http://www.erbzine.com/mag17/1753.html

  19. renaissanceguy Avatar

    Good job, Eve. Even a non-expert can follow your explanation.

    I don’t want to be picky, but you have an error in the first paragraph that you might want to correct. You wrote animus where you meant anima. I’m just trying to help!

    Feel free to proofread my blog anytime.

    1. Eve Avatar

      RG, Thanks for your proofreading; I hate a typo or error in my copy, so appreciate your attention to detail. Of course, you’re correct: I did mean to write “anima.”

  20. Frank_Rizzo Avatar
    Frank_Rizzo

    Thanks for the explanation Eve, it was very interesting. May I proudly say that I have Iron John on my bookshelf? May I hang my head and say that I haven’t read it yet 🙂

    I find it interesting that I said in an earlier post that most of the feminine qualities that I find myself attracted to internalizing are usually from artistic people that I know. You mentioned in the Sophia section that she serves as the artist’s muse, which I find intriguing. Perhaps my own Sophia is trying to point me towards these attributes in other people? I also find it interesting that these are people who only a couple years ago I looked at as wusses, overly feminine. Now I don’t necessarily think any different, I just find attributes they possess that I am sometimes envious of.

    Take for instance my brother-in-law. He is quite the artist. He floats through life, no direction, no care to how he will support himself, he just wants to perform. My deep masculine side despises him for not being that provider. Then I see how much he cares for his friends, how he internalizes their problems, empathizes with them, and cares so much he finds himself depressed about his friends struggles. I don’t want this to the degree that he has it, but am finding the “It’s your own damn problem, deal with it” attitude to be most unhelpful also.

    Is this perhaps my anima overpowering my animus and saying “Hey, I need to get out and breathe a little”?

    1. Eve Avatar

      Rizzo, yes, I do think your anima is crying out. You might as well ask her what her name is and take her to “bring your anima to work day” (isn’t that at the end of this month?).

      It seems to me that you’re right on target with knowing yourself. And do read Iron John when you have time (you can get the audio book you know).

      You surprise me with every comment.

  21. A Avatar
    A

    Okay, question. How does this paradigm change with a gay man (obviously asking for self-interest). This isn’t an “abstract” progression, and has many manifestations mentioned in each stage. Are they similar for a same-sex-attracted man? This is assuming that Jung’s view of homosexuality is not that it’s an aberration of a “natural” orientation – in essence, a pathology.

    1. Eve Avatar

      “A,” this is a good question. My short answer to your question is yes, I think that the progression would be the same for a gay man, and I’ll ramble on a bit and tell you why I think so.

      Jung didn’t write at length about homosexuality, but what he did say is interesting and seems balanced to me. He didn’t see being gay as an aberration of a natural orientation, or as a pathology, as you suggested–not as an illness in itself. He saw the potentially neurotic effects of the lifestyle, and acknowledged that it was so widespread that seeing it as a perversion or an illness was “dubious.”

      Instead, he regarded homosexuality as arising from possibilities, among which were a partial attachment to the hermaphrodite archetype, or an over-identification with the anima; or, then again, in some men it might be a compulsion to identify with a one-sided sexual being. Any of these reasons for being gay might or might not be negative, depending on the individual and how he lived his life in relation to other aspects of wholeness. He wrote somewhere that Adam was, in effect, also a one-sided sexual being and that some homosexuals might be trying to regain their Adams, so to speak.

      My thoughts on the possible relation between being gay and being over-identified with the anima is to look at the description of the bitchy anima and then think about gay men I’ve known or know now; some are exactly the picture of the bitchy, moody, less-than-a-woman anima. Others are normal gay men. I’d say that if the over-identified-with-the-anima shoe fits, a guy should wear it. What he may think comes off as gay may be no more than neurotic over-identification with his anima, which does no one any good and is merely grating. Make sense?

      Freud considered homosexuality a perversion of a person’s sexuality, even though he also taught that humans were innately bisexual–to which I think that Jung’s theories of the anima and animus proved a sensible and beautiful counterpoint.

      There has been some writing on Jungian thought and gay issues. Men’s Studies Press has a journal article here that sounds interesting, and possibly addresses your question by indicating that the same archetypal myths apply to people regardless of sexual orientation.

      Also, Robert Hopcke has written a book called Jung, Jungians, and Homosexuality about the issue. I haven’t read the book yet. If you read it, I’d like to know what you think.

  22. Smiler Avatar

    I’m loving this series. I want to come back and read it again and again. Are you considering publishing it? Because you should.

    1. Eve Avatar

      Smiler, I’m glad you’re enjoying the archetypes series. I’m going to be completing it this week (I hope) with a view to illustrating through myth how the story of individuation is told over and over again from age to age. It’s exciting and captivating stuff!

      I’ve written about archetypes before, including for my last master’s thesis. However, I haven’t had it published yet. There’s already a great deal of stuff already published out there (Inner City Books, for example, publishes so many wonderful little depth psychology books) that I don’t see the need to re-hash most of what I’m publishing here.

      However, I have my archetypal hobby horses I like to ride, and ride them I will. Perhaps even to a publisher eventually. For now, I’m just practicing writing, and getting back out into the world after living in my ivory tower for a long time.

      Just imagine me tossing my hair like Rapunzel. ;o)

  23. Alida Avatar
    Alida

    Hold the tylenol, I’m getting the hang of this. I’ve been raising kids for the past five years. So great to read something stimulating. My son is just learning to read and as much fun as it is to hear him read “Tub Fun”, I was afraid my brain was turning to mush.

    You’ve saved me Eve, I owe you.

    1. Eve Avatar

      Alida, hahaha! I can so identify with you. I’m still raising children, myself, which is exactly why I keep my buddy Jung and his cronies handy. They keep me on my toes!

Leave a Reply

Discover more from The Third Eve

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading