Masks

Masked reveler at Carnival

Once the ego has emerged in early childhood, we begin to decide what parts of ourselves—what traits—we’ll let people see and what parts we’ll conceal or withhold. We learn to camouflage reactions others condemn and choose actions that please them and reward us. A young child, for example, realizes that needs-based crying gets results, so learns to cry to obtain wants. If punished for crying, they learn to control it. We begin to form masks to express or hide who we are inside.

Jung called this mask the Persona. If our parents communicated love, support, and acceptance for us, we probably originally formed a persona to please them. We might also have formed it to please them if we feared them and were afraid of displeasing them. If we didn’t feel acceptance from them, we may have reversed the persona and perversely tried to displease them, getting rid of those qualities that might have pleased them. In any case, we kept some of our natural qualities and shut away others. The Persona is a necessary adaptation that allows human beings to live together. A raw, unmediated personality would be more than we or others could bear.

As we in grow in wisdom, we learn to use the Persona to bring whatever parts of us are appropriate to a given situation. The Persona is only a problem when it hides too much or too little. Giving ourselves permission to react however we want in a situation is as destructive as keeping it all locked up.

The persona is a social necessity.
Through it we relate to our world.

The process of civilizing a human being leads to a compromise between oneself and society as to how one should be and appear. The Persona is a mask or costume of sorts that shows the role a person is playing. It’s often necessary to develop and display a persona in order to succeed at a role. A businessman must appear forceful and energetic, an academic intelligent, a civil servant correct, a professional intelligent and well-dressed, and so on. One dons the identity befitting the role.

As we consider the different roles we play and expect others to play, we can see that the Persona is a collective phenomenon, a facet of the personality whose ownership is shared with others in a culture or particular setting. Some people are so good at their personas that their personifications are mistaken for individuality. To some extent, people do choose the roles to which they feel best suited, so in this sense their persona may express individuality. But it is never the whole person.

The persona is a social necessity. Through it we relate to our world. It simplifies contacts with others by communicating what they can expect from us, and what we can expect from them. People who neglect persona development tend to be gauche, to offend others, and to have difficulty in establishing themselves in the world. They’re often hard to get along with and can be prone to various kinds of outbursts or behaviors that confuse or offend others. Thus, the skilled development of persona is important to life among other people.

There is always the danger, however, of identifying oneself with the role one fills, a danger easy to excuse when that role is rewarding and well-suited to the individual. An over-developed persona can mask the self so completely that major aspects of the Self fall into the shadow. “He plays a part,” one says, or “she’s not really like that at all,” another observes. Those who aren’t true to their own natures and over-develop the persona are in danger of losing their way.

A healthy relationship to one’s persona in all its aspects is to stay in touch with its qualities inside our awareness, and the traits and qualities we don’t incorporate into Persona. We know those parts belong to the Self but are sometimes—if not often—inappropriate in the outer world. We continue to greet and nurture those aspects while handling our persona skillfully. Such practice can produce a healthy persona that doesn’t hide us from ourselves.


12 responses to “Masks”

  1. Irene Avatar

    I’m probably a bit too late to comment here, but never mind. I think often about this role-playing, and in one area, my painting, it has an effect on my career. I tend not to make compromises in the sort of work I do, and often get told my work is ‘too strong’ and changes all the time (not good for one’s marketability). I call this my ‘mutability’. Or, like Ingres, I have many different paint brushes! I think a long time ago I developed far too much flexibility so as to be pleasing, and am aware I can be a chameleon according to who I am with. With the painting, I think this impacts my work by being able to shift style with each new body of work. Good or Bad? Depends on who you talk to. And I guess, more importantly for me, depends on my motivation for the change too. Am I trying to please what I perceive is acceptable to the Art Academia, or am I just an avid explorer? Or somewhere in between? Mostly I feel I am still just searching for the ‘perfect’ painting, and my pleasure in paint takes me all over the place.
    Then I am often asked why I can’t just tone down and make paintings that sell, and do my other stuff ‘in-between’. HA. At this point I become incredibly inflexible. Stubborn. Angry. That says a lot, eh?

    Eve, I really loved your description of costumes – it got me thinking about an interesting version of a self-portrait, masks and clothes! I often dress according to how I am feeling, giving outward expression to the resident persona to some degree – arty, feminine, couldn’t-care-less (That one is because I can hide in my studio)! Sometimes, even the colours I put on link in with colours I am using in the studio, quite unconsciously. Curiously, this was a common phenomenon in art school when I was there.

    1. Eve Avatar

      Irene, it’s never too late to comment here or to enter a conversation. You pondered “why can’t I just tone down and make paintings that sell?” I think you’ve grown a Self, and once that happens, the Self does its selfing. I don’t write for commercial success or to establish myself somehow. I write because I must, and in a variety of topics. For me, it is more valuable to grow protect the growth of the acorn than it is to have admiring throngs. Or to be paid for what’s commercially popular. I can get what’s popular and sells at Hobby Lobby. We’ll never find your art, or one of my books, there.

  2. Lee Avatar
    Lee

    Fascinating post and as the mom of an Aspergers person, I can see that my Chet isn’t able to wear masks. Chet is just Chet. That is both a celebration and a sorrow. There are times, darn it, when a mask is not a bad thing. But he doesn’t get social nuances, can’t read body language, doesn’t understand that a sarcastic comment is not true humor etc.

    I spend a lot of time trying to give him more clothes in his emotional closet to choose from!

  3. henitsirk Avatar

    I think there’s a flip side, so to speak, of the persona. I think we don’t just choose which mask to wear based on our internal state but also in relation to others and the world around. I play Dutiful Mom when I volunteer in my son’s classroom, because I respect the teacher and her authority there. She and the children don’t need Bitchy Hormonal Mom or Disorganized Crafty Woman or Nitpicking Editor Lady.

  4. Eve Avatar

    David, you make me laugh out loud so often. I just love you and your wittiness. The reality TV show is sure to be a hit. Ha ha HA!!

    Jung wrote a lot about dialogues and guided imagery with one’s different archetypal parts. I think this is a useful practice. Sticking with the metaphor of the closet and the clothing, maybe sometimes it’s right to fling open the doors (or take the doors off altogether) and do a spring cleaning. I did this last year during my bout with What Not to Wear, and it was helpful. Some of the items I tried on horrified me. I had actually bought and worn them!

    I find that the various personas I use or must use feel the same way sometimes. For example, I had a Soccer Mom persona who actually went to soccer games and was in the PTO. The problem now is that I don’t do soccer games and I don’t want to join the PTO. In fact, I pretty much despise going to my kids’ school events. I’ve learned why not to substitute teach; I’ve learned not to volunteer, and my kids have only been in school since August.

    So, what persona do I get for the New Eve? Obviously, the Soccer Mom persona of the 1990s is not going to work for me any more. That persona needs to be donated to charity so that someone who fits it can use it. This leaves me without an appropriate persona to wear, so I find myself bumbling along instead, trying to throw together an outfit that is no more appropriate than you wearing a pajama top under your button-down collar dress shirt.

    But at least I know what’s in the closet, how it got there, why it’s there, and that it doesn’t fit any more or that I’m not very well dressed. It will be interesting to see how you get to the part where you know all these things and don’t see your fractured selves as parts of someone else, or as someone else’s children (so to speak). I wonder how you will get there, or if it is even necessary to get there? I know, not spoken as a Responsible Psychologist (oh, now there’s a snappy persona I like to take to cocktail parties!).

    Perhaps I’ll keep track of my personas this week and see how many different outfits I actually have. I have already used Dutiful Mom at the dental office, when I took my daughter to have a cavity filled. She is very polite.

    Dutiful Mom, not my daughter. My daughter still needs to develop some persona, bless her.

  5. Scott Erb Avatar

    Very interesting post (and actually relates to a lot of research on foreign policy decision making). I agree with your point. I think the key is to know oneself. One should be cognizant of the roles one plays and what one is really thinking. That requires self-honesty (and to avoid fearing self-judgment) If someone is really introspective, they’ll recognize the roles and scripts as what they are, and enjoy introspection when ‘released’ from those roles/scripts, and be better able to know when and how much to ‘let down ones’ guard’ in social situation. The key: know thyself!

  6. Eve Avatar

    Deb, interesting comment. Perhaps you had to have so much persona while growing up that you grew tired of her, so grew up with a vengeance? It’s almost as if one says, “I gave up my real self long enough, dammit, and I’m not going to do it any more!”

    I’m reminded in a small way of the resigned idealized type person Freudian Karen Horney wrote about, who has resolved her problem of an unacceptable real self by making a psychological move “away from” others (the other options being moving against others in an expansive way, and moving toward others in a self-effacing way).

    I would rather be a WYSIWYG person than don a constricting, false persona. However, by its very definition, the persona is just a mask anyway. We see what happens when we take off our masks before imbeciles. Jesus said “don’t cast your pearls before swine,” and Buddha said to travel with your equals or better. I think there is something to be said for a protective persona.

    However, I am still thinking about this and how it works in real life, with a conscious person, and with people wanting to become self-actualized or whatever one wants to call it. In other words, I too am still in negotiations with my persona.

  7. David Avatar
    David

    I like the idea of a persona-wardrobe; that’s a useful image for me, in thinking about what it might be like to have a more integrated concept that my various personas actually belong to me and are in my wardrobe, rather than belonging to other people who have no apparent connection to my life except when they decide to show up.

    I think I need some kind of internal personal shopper/fashion consultant, who can help me to organize the closet better, or at least take down the steel walls that separate my double-breasted blazers from my polo shirts. Half the time I don’t know what the heck goes on in there, or how I ended up still wearing a pajama top under my button-down dress shirt, nor why I am compelled to take the shirt off at the worst possible moment.

    I believe I may have a concept for a reality show, here: “Integrated Eye for the Comparmentalized Guy.”

  8. deb Avatar

    I think I tend to be more like an autistic person, I am not good at dissembling and I am the same person wherever you meet me. There are slight tweeks but mostly, what you see is what you get. That being said, I withhold much of myself around my siblings and mother. Have to think about this more.

  9. Eve Avatar

    Crazymumma and Henitsirk, your comments one on top of the other are interesting, for they point out both ends of the relational spectrum. My own ideas about the persona have changed over the years to rest in a place where I consider the persona to be a necessary costume. As long as I remember it’s a collective costume and understood only by collectives, and am not fooled into thinking that it’s real or actually me, I’m fine.

    Developmentally, people go through phases with their personas. We work hard to develop one during childhood and young adulthood, and then spend middle age and beyond divesting ourselves of that focus. Less ego, more Self. There seems to come a time during mid-life when try and evict Persona. Not a pretty sight! Crazymumma emphasizes the seamy underbelly.

    On the other hand, we have what happens when we do what Heni points out, which is to use the persona so masterfully that we share nothing real. We’re like cocktail party attendees, going through life with polite smiles pasted on our faces.

    Sometimes I think the best use of the persona is to use it like clothing. “Hmm, which outfit will I wear today?” I ask as I stand in my closet, looking at my clothing options. “Too cold for this; and I’m not feeling as casual as all that. But if I wear that, I’ll feel over-dressed. I think I’ll wear this.” And the choice is made.

    I think if I put on my persona for each occasion in the same way I put on my clothes or my makeup, it would feel like my real self was in the front seat with my ego, collaborating, rather than being the petulant child she sometimes is, pouting in the back seat because Mommy won’t let Real Me sit up front with her.

  10. henitsirk Avatar

    It occurred to me reading this that perhaps people diagnosed with Asperger’s or autism, who just don’t understand how to relate to people or see the subtle social cues that most of us are unaware of but work with somewhat instinctively, were not able to create a persona.

    What irony — to facilitate social interaction we hide parts of ourselves, which means we never truly share ourselves with each other, which is actually anti-social.

  11. crazymumma Avatar

    exactly the perfect thing to read after reading your comment over my way.

    some of what is inside is so terribly ugly. Thank goodness it can be written.

Leave a Reply